Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal (1990 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. With no response for several days to DaxServer's ping, I don't think a relist will help. but no objection to draftifying if the Bengali editors can identify sufficient sourcing. Star  Mississippi  02:38, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Criminal (1990 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Passing mentions of a film in various TV listings and lists of credits does not demonstrate general notability or other evidence of notability. Wikipedia is not a film database like IMDb. We aim to treat films in an encyclopedic manner, discussing their development, design, reception, significance, and influence in addition to providing concise summaries of them. In the absence of significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, we cannot do that. Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and Bangladesh. Worldbruce (talk) 16:41, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - There is nothing in this article that establishes film notability or general notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:00, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep - This film has significant newspaper coverage, web mentions enough to pass notability. It was a huge success after release. Abbasulu (talk) 21:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If "significant newspaper coverage" exists, where is it? --Worldbruce (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:57, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * DELETE as per nom. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 04:22, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 *  Keep  - this film article has significant coverage. I see no reason to delete. Abbasulu (talk) 20:48, 2 June 2022 (UTC) (duplicate !vote stricken off — DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:51, 2 June 2022 (UTC))
 * Comment: Pinging some editors with Bengali knowledge - - so they might be able to uncover possible sources about the film, at least 2 reviews of reception would be needed for an WP:NFO — DaxServer (t · m · c) 21:03, 2 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.