Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criminal accusation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nja 247 19:47, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Criminal accusation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)


 * I found this page deleted (prodded). It seems an important topic to me. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The person who prodded gave the reason "since the merge hasn't happened and it has been nine or so months, I suggest that the article be deleted if only to give the admins a kick in the butt to merge this important article". 1) This fails the prod criteria. Since there appears to be a consensus to merge a deletion would obviously not be uncontroversial which is what PROD is for. 2) Deletion is not cleanup. 3) There is no need to kick administrator's to perform the merge. Anyone can, including the person who prodded the article in the first place. 4) Article can be redirected with a note on the target page so a merge can be performed later. In short: No one provided a valid reason to delete. - Mgm|(talk) 09:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - relevant subject - Skysmith (talk) 10:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:DICDEF. Dlabtot (talk) 17:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.