Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimson (typeface)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:43, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Crimson (typeface)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Lack of substantial coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the topic. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  19:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:33, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  19:07, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete, there appears to be no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. CMD (talk) 01:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.