Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimson Avenger (Jill Carlyle)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Crimson Avenger. Missvain (talk) 02:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Crimson Avenger (Jill Carlyle)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Zero real world notability. Nothing but blurbs in fan magazines. WP:PLOT applies to the current article. No true in-depth coverage exists, fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:36, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone  18:40, 5 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Crimson Avenger- While the overall moniker of the Crimson Avenger is notable, I'm not finding much that would justify this particular incarnation being split off into an independent article separate from the main topic. The only non-primary sources being used in the article are little listicle blurbs or extremely passing mentions (the "Superhero Comics" book, for example, has exactly one sentence mentioning her), and I'm not finding much else beyond that in searches.  The little tidbits of sourced info here can be merged to the main article on the Crimson Avenger.  Rorshacma (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment Wow. Talk about premature. I was thinking of self merging it again myself. The main source that stands out is the DC Comics character guide book by DK where she is with all the rest of the major players. Though I am not sure that’s enough. An close accomplishment though if we could find more sources though which I wanted to root for. Anyways an AFD was still unneeded when we could have done a simple merge request. Jhenderson  7 7 7  19:39, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Crimson Avenger. Not seeing sources that would pass GNG, but merging is the solution here, not deletion. Rhino131 (talk) 21:20, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Crimson Avenger. Another over-eager AfD that shouldn't have filed to begin with. The proper process for this is outlined over there.  Dark knight  2149  01:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - Let this page stay. This version of the character split off like the original Crimson Avenger so that it would mostly detail about this incarnation. Plus, is right about about this AFD being premature and unneeded. --Rtkat3 (talk) 20:33, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Crimson Avenger per above.  // Timothy ::  talk  10:35, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge per above but there is not much to merge. And no, AfDs are fine to determine whether there is consensus for merge, delete redirect or such. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  01:18, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The sole purpose of AfD is to nominate articles for deletion (and there is specific criteria for deletion). There are other venues for redirects and merging. AfD isn't a one-stop-shop for "I have a problem with this article". That other stuff usually happens when the community disagrees with the nomination to delete.  Dark knight  2149  00:52, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , It is common and perfectly acceptable to support an AtD at an AfD. From the first paragraph of WP:AFD: "Common outcomes are that the article is kept, merged, redirected, incubated, renamed/moved to another title, userfied to a user subpage, or deleted per the deletion policy."  // Timothy ::  talk  01:12, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.