Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crimson timebomb


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 08:34, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Crimson timebomb

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Local band. The gomemphis link gives at least a minor assertion of notability, but IMHO it just is not enough, thus this AFD. TexasAndroid (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  —TexasAndroid (talk) 15:44, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's little there beyond inflated, unsourced hype. There's one album, but no claim of actual release - no label or anything that would make me think it was more than a demo. Not notable or verifiable. Hairhorn (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I know, of course, that a Google search is not a reliable test of notability, but it can give an impression. I searched through dozens of hits and found nothing that could by any stretch of the imagination be called reliable independent coverage; if there were extensive coverage I would have expected to come up with at least something, however small. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.