Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrisVan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, then redirect to discourage recreation. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 05:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

CrisVan

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. First and foremost, this is a recreation of a former article that was previously deleted. The article, in and of itself, is futile, redundant, and has no merit…about a defunct fictional soap couple. It is biasly written, and is being used to promote a fan base. Also, the article features a bevy of plugs and advertisements to personal and agenda-based websites.—WikiTweak 09:37, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or if we must, Redirect to One Life to Live in the same way as Dusty Donovan and Lucy Montgomery were. Both actors & characters have got their own articles anyway, which isn't the case with many other couples in soaps, so there's nothing additional here.  Looking at the link to Supercouple reveals a veritable glut of AfD candidates.  Eliminator JR  Talk  09:45, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to One Life to Live, although I do admire the article's use of "portmanteau." Propaniac 13:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above, mainly becase this was a copy an past edit of Tangeline as you can cleary see in the picture sum, Todd.... as well as there is no in depth history, and also added some things which there is not note for like you say they changed the face for supercouples...how?--Migospia †♥ 06:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.