Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cris P


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete, I think it satisfies category a7, no assertion of notability, but we'll call it WP:SNOW to be safe. NawlinWiki 20:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Cris P

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

(Sigh...) Contested prod, so here we go wasting everyone's time... Unsigned musician with no releases, no media coverage whatsoever and not even a myspace page let alone a single reliable source. —  iride  scent  17:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Isn't there a speed category for non-notable bands? -- Mikeblas 17:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * SPeedy Delete This should have gone under and not even gotten here. Improbcat 17:16, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately doesn't fit A7 for a speedy as there's an assertion of notability, even if it's almost certainly bogus; "hoax" is (necessarily but annoyingly) specifically not a speedy criteria. —  iride  scent  17:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The speedy tag reads: [...]that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject.
 * Which as far as I can tell reads that it hasn't indicated that it meets those criteria. Being persued by two major labels and a rumor or signing a third, along with a few small shows and airtime on a tiny station is not any assertion of meeting the Notability (music) criteria. If the article said "He has signed to Virgin records and has been interviewed on MTV" when he hadn't then it would be a hoax. Improbcat 17:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If anyone wants to slap a db-bio on it, believe me I won't argue... I suspect it'll be turned down though. —  iride  scent  17:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete even if not speediable, and even if the claims to notability aren't a hoax, this article still provides no EVIDENCE in the form of reliable, third-party sources that indicate notability, and thus should be deleted. --Jayron32| talk | contribs 17:36, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. See WP:N. Subdolous 17:46, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I declined the speedy, for two reasons: 1. Hoaxes can't fall under speedy, 2. Even if the Virgin deal is false (and the whole thing is a hoax), it still gives some impression of notability. Still doesn't mean it's safe from deletion mind you, just informing you of my logic here.  Kwsn   (Ni!)  18:32, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - for everything listed above. Jauerback 18:42, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of a signing other than with Virgin.  No prejudice to recreation when Cris signs and releases an album - and hopefully doesn't flop. =^_^= -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I can see the reasons for not making it a speedy, but do I see WP:SNOW outside? Stifle (talk) 23:09, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't complain about a snowball delete. I'll run it up the pole (good ol' generic db), see who salutes. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:21, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.