Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cris Taliana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. 1ne 06:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Cris Taliana
Not notable, and also does not meet the proposed notability test for porn stars. Delete. --- Hong Qi Gong 03:29, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom will381796 04:07, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. "more than 40 film credits", according to the article. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 04:39, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * According to WP:PORN BIO, she needs 100. More than 40 could mean 41. If it can be demonstrated that she has 100 or more, I will change my comment. --HResearcher 10:17, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. -- Koffieyahoo 06:10, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * doesn't meet WP:PORN BIO either. Notability based on number of films requires 100 films or more.  Following these guidelines, she is not notable...yet.  will381796 06:21, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nominator(HongQiGong), Koffieyahoo, and Will381796. --HResearcher 10:19, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not even halfway to meeting WP:PORN BIO, and a long long long way off from meeting WP:BIO. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  10:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete for now. Taking a look at the WP:PORN BIO criteria, Cris does not meet criteria #8 (over 100 films) - as pointed out earlier by HResearcher. Article does make an argument with regards to criteria #3 to 7. Her name does not show up on either the List of people in Playboy 2000-present or the List of Penthouse Pets, so criteria #2 is out. In terms of criteria #1, I can find no sign that she's won an award from the XRCO or from the AVN Awards. In fact I have a list of all the nominations from 2001 to 2004 and Cris was not even so much as nominated. If she does end up meeting the criteria down the road, we can recreate the article at that point. Tabercil 04:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.