Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crisis of faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:17, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Crisis of faith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The term is likely notable, but this article suffers from major OR/essay issues. It may be right, it may be wrong, but it almost certainly is an essay-like OR piece. It has been my experience that such articles are better off getting WP:TNTed, and hopefully someone will recreate it with proper footnotes and references. Ping User:Staszek Lem who brought it to my attention. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:30, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak delete and redirect to Spiritual crisis per nom. Based on Google search it looks like this term is somewhat common in Christian circles? I don't think there's anything in there that would improve Spiritual crisis (which badly needs a cleanup with inline refs). Ajpolino (talk) 05:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * delete WP:TNT. Article history shows it was created as an unreferenced blugb, then someone added more blurb about doubts and temptations. And this resulted is something still incomprehensible without faith in wikipedians :-) who wrote that. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:09, 18 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: when I searched for Crisis of faith I found this source, it also use the term "religious crisis", this term is used by a bunch of sources. I agree that the citations are incomplete and that it seems to be an OR. But maybe there is some material for an article. I would recommend the deletion of any unsourced or poorly sourced content and start again with reliable sources. Even if left us with a stub article. In my opinion it's better have a well sourced stub than an OR filled article that could give the readers wrong information about the subject. Rupert Loup (talk) 08:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.