Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crispin Sartwell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. AfD withdrawn. Drmies (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Crispin Sartwell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable, doesn't meet GNG, article is very light on the sources. Two of them are forwards/intros to other people's books. The other is a summary to his own book. Article has had a citations template on it since 2012.  Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 13:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC) 13:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:31, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article needs a ton of work, and perhaps this AfD leads to improvement, but the subject is no doubt notable, with over a half a dozen books with notable presses. I quickly dug up a half a dozen reviews, plus one article which argues that he's one of the most notable epistemologists of our time. (A really boring article, by the way--imagine having to read the tenure files for philosophers.) Drmies (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn: I would like to see some more work on the page, but the sources Drmies added is enough to meet GNG and N, and probably pull down that Citiations template. So, with that, I withdraw this AfD. -  Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 02:39, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.