Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristián Berríos


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:32, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Cristián Berríos

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Technical AfD proposal: MisterWiki/Diego Grez proposed this page through PROD, Random009 (globally blocked for sockpuppets) denies the consensual PROD.

The deletion arguments given by Diego Grez are lack of sources, lack of notoriety, not work published by editor, mass flood by the author on different wikipedia projects (ca. es. fr. de.). Dereckson (talk) 11:12, 30 April 2010 (UTC) Technical word striked. --Dereckson (talk) 12:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)


 * STRONG DELETE Cross-wiki spam by the subject, currently locked. See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Steward_requests/Global#Global_lock.2Funlock_for_Cristi.C3.A1n_Berr.C3.ADos In addition to be a blatant fake and constant disruption and flood on other Wikipedias. --Diego Grez let's talk 03:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC) Copied over from User talk:HJ Mitchell since currently under restriction. ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ message • changes) 04:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Diego. ~ Nerdy Science Dude  (✉ message • changes) 04:04, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- RP459  Talk/Contributions 16:48, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:22, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. I made a mistake reading the article history: it were KillionDude and not Diego Grez who nominated the article for deletion per PROD. The Diego Grez's arguments were given on the de. deletion. --Dereckson (talk) 12:31, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yeah, I was the PRODer. It's kind of silly that the article creator (now known as a sockmaster) was able to remove the PROD and another admin declared that endgame for the proposed deletion. In any case, this bio doesn't seem notable and, from what I've seen, seems to be something like free advertisement for the subject in question (who seemed to have translated this article into as many languages as possible and make articles on several Wikipedias of himself). Killiondude (talk) 07:58, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.