Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Lark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Cristina Lark

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable actor lacking ghits and Gnews. red dog six (talk) 02:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

The previous status of "non-notable actor lacking ghits and Gnews" was immediately generated after the page was created with a short paragraph about the actor (her name and the information that she is an actress). Minutes later, more information, references and links were added.--Vivinabel (talk) 02:45, 2 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:05, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * KEEP: Solid credits in theater and screen in 3 different countries. Interviewed by newspapers and networks. Award-winning .--AbiRed (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC) — AbiRed (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment - The "newspaper interview" has nothing to do with the article subject and the "networks" item is a social media site that is currently down. Regardless neither provide adequate secondary references to support verifable, independent sourcing for the article.   red dog six  (talk) 22:18, 2 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep The biography needs to be filled out but this recently written article (10/1/2013) has improved in the few days since being nominated and references have been added. It's a decent stub, I've seen actor stubs with 1/10 of the content this page has. Liz  Read! Talk! 14:47, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
 * P.S. As an aside, I think it's crazy that 8 minutes after this article is posted on to Wikipedia, it gets a PROD, then nominated as a AfD. Articles aren't expected to be B- or C-Class minutes after they're created.  Liz  Read! Talk! 14:58, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment - Just how has the article been improved. I don't see a plethora of support for the article or even a small smattering of verifable, independent non-trivial support for the article - actually to be honest the majority of references are IMDB or self-generated.  No one is asking for a completed article at inception, but where are the references that support notability?


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:44, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Comment. Can anyone comment on whether any of her roles have been significant, as required by WP:NACTOR?  It doesn't look like it, but I'm not familiar with many of the roles listed.  I can't find any mention of her on Google, either.  The award listed earlier seems to be for the web series, not her. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.