Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristina Vasiloiu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 00:57, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Cristina Vasiloiu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatantly promotional piece by a single-purpose account, but precious little evidence of third-party sources establishing notability. - Biruitorul Talk 16:15, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Cristina Vasiloiu is a well known personality in Romania and abroad. More sources may be added, but no one can say she is not a person to be in Wikipedia, being well above most entries from her country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Basildon (talk • contribs) 21:34, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Per WP:BIO, "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." If you'd like this article to be kept, you would do well to demonstrate, with evidence not assertions, precisely how Vasiloiu meets these criteria. - Biruitorul Talk 22:35, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as not notable according to GNG. FurrySings (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:33, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete, not notable.--Ymblanter (talk) 08:20, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, requires significant coverage in reliable sources. --  Wikipedical (talk) 21:25, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.