Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristobal Model 3


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Cristobal Model 3

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable firearm. English and Spanish language searches turned up no reliable sources. Created by User:Ctway sock. ansh 666 08:44, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Firearms-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. ansh 666  08:45, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines.--RAF910 (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:28, 17 February 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Just an obscure prototype. --Mr. Magoo (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge into either an article on the Armory, or into one of their more successful designs. This is in Smith and Smith, if memory serves.  Anmccaff (talk) 21:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment...No such article exists. The only successful weapon produced by Armería San Cristóbal was the Cristóbal Carbine a .30 Carbine copy of the Hungarian Danuvia 43M submachine gun. You would need to rename and completely rewrite that article to make to Model 3 fit. Even then, the new article would have notability problems of its own.--RAF910 (talk) 18:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.