Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cristovao Vilela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:29, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Cristovao Vilela

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

No coverage at reliable sources found (GNews/Scholar/Books have 0 hits), current sources do not seem substantial enough --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  —--  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 08:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with lack of sources, particularly considering the 'highly successful' life that Vilela is aid to have lived — Preceding unsigned comment added by Darigan (talk • contribs) 09:08, 27 April 2010
 * Delete fails WP:BIO. If I removed the unsourced content, the article would consist of simply his name. --Cameron Scott (talk) 09:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:BIO Tarheel95 (talk) 12:54, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 03:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 03:05, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete; fails the guideline for athletes, WP:ATHLETE, having played in minor non-professional leagues, and the general biography guideline at WP:BIO; I've yet to discover reliable sources covering his alleged "achievements". Ironholds (talk) 00:53, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails both WP:ATHLETE and WP:GNG Steve-Ho (talk) 12:31, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.