Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criterion (journal)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No consensus after almost a month at AFD. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 19:46, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Criterion (journal)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only source is a brief 4-sentence "article" in the Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana. Not indexed in any selective databases. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals, hence: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 09:44, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 12:56, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:GNG and WP:NJournals. I could not find any coverage of this defunct journal in reliable sources. However, my search was limited to English sources, and I would be willing to change my vote if someone can show coverage in foreign language sources. -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, GeoffreyT2000  ( talk,  contribs ) 22:41, 13 November 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. In my view, an entry in the Gran Enciclopèdia Catalana is sufficient evidence of notability, regardless of length. Cf. my comment at Articles for deletion/Estudios Franciscanos. --Hegvald (talk) 01:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:08, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.