Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criti Noll


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:09, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Criti Noll

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Minor character that has since been killed off. This article mostly contains copy and pasted material from the Hank Pym, and i see no reason why they need to be separated. Also the time in which Criti Noll took over as Hank Pym is in debate as the Mighty Avenger #15 issue which saw Pym get replaced did not specifically state the name of the Skrull who replaced him. It was not until Avengers: The Initiative #14 that the name Criti Noll was given and in the most recent issue of Mighty Avengers it was stated that Criti Noll was not the first Skrull to replace Pym. Paulley (talk) 09:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Question - I am a bit confused on your AfD request. Not what you are saying, but why you are saying it. What exactly is the grounds you are requesting a deletion of this article on? As it stands, you are stating WP:IDONTLIKEIT and WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Neither of these are grounds for deletion. Turlo Lomon (talk) 12:47, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - Because its the same information on two pages and its factually inaccurate. Wikipedia is not a guidebook to every character in the Marvel Universe. At best this page should be redirected back to Hank Pym. --- Paulley (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth" - Everything in the article is sourced. If you are concerned about factual changes, then change them - with sources. I believe a more appropriate resolution to this would be to propose a merge on both pages, with a redirect from this one to the other. However, your original AfD indicates none of this. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Reply - Sorry i wasnt clear in the original nomination.. Obviously "Minor character that has since been killed off. This article mostly contains copy and pasted material from the Hank Pym, and i see no reason why they need to be separated." wasnt clear enough so next time i will take more care in my explanation. As for cleaning up the factual inaccuracies, that is what i have done in Hank Pym; only to realize this page had been made. You are right though, i should have gone the proposed merge route first before going to this extreme. If you would like i can retract this afd and propose a merge? --- Paulley (talk) 15:32, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Speedy Close - I think Paulley and I are in agreement that this should be discussed on the talk page to merge the two articles which would be more appropriate. I think this can be handled without an AfD. Turlo Lomon (talk) 15:36, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Close - nominator has indicated that he wishes to discuss a merge instead of a delete. BOZ (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Let the page stay, he is a major character in the Secret Invasion storyline. Rtkat3 (talk) 3:23, 28 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.