Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Links (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus that this is promotional and lacks demonstrated notability. ~ mazca  talk 01:03, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Critical Links
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not pass WP:CORP. Current sourcing is extremely weak. A search didn't come up with anything other than press releases. Rusf10 (talk) 23:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 04:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)


 * delete. Obvious spam and has been since it was created 9 years (!!!) ago. Jytdog (talk) 05:18, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete- clearly promotional. Reyk YO! 11:51, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not notable and promotional Tazerdadog (talk) 07:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Zero indications of notabilty, totally promotional, fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. On a related note, I've also nominated the founder João Carreira article for deletion also.  HighKing++ 16:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.