Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Ontology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Critical Ontology
Delete. It reads like an advertisement. There are no non-primary or otherwise credible sources cited. The Google, it turns up a lot of sites associated to the author of the idea, or that otherwise seek to make money off it. There's only 521 results anyways, which is peanuts. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I prodded this previously, but it was recreated after the prod. The recreation counts as contesting the prod. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:48, 26 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete This sounds like a typical, academic tempest in a teapot. It's still basically in the realm of a neologism and therefore not (yet) suitable for an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia isn't for cutting edge things or fly-by-night fads. Inter lingua  talk 04:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I hope I can be forgiven for momentarily confusing this with General Semantics...  But yeah, definitely non-notable&mdash;no references except for two (self-published?) books by CO's creator.  --zenohockey 05:02, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism. --Coredesat 08:54, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, This is now on the Antiwikipedia at [] where we fully welcome non-notable neologisms and advertisements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.78.192.139 (talk • contribs)
 * Delete Obscure WP:NEO. --DaveG12345 20:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as neo &mdash;Xyra e l 21:19, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Ontology. Zos 03:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.