Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:58, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Critical Software

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This does seem like spam, even if vaguely connected with a university. Note for instance the lead description, lifted from BusinessWeek, and the lack of third-party references. Biruitorul Talk 15:48, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep.It seems to be a major company in their own field. The article needs some improvement and third party references but it doesn't really look like spam. I found this news among others. Laurent (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - Article needs a lot of work, but seems to be a well-established, viable company. Needs references and a rewrite of milestones - they are lifted from company website.  ttonyb1 (talk) 16:40, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:02, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep, very weakly. I edited the article to remove the copyrighted text from Business Week and the official site, and what's left is a very slight stub.  A possibly interesting business whose article gets lost in systems-speak. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment There are quite a few articles about its spin off company, Critical Links, on TMC: Laurent (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.