Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critical area (computing)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Critical area (computing)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Undersourced; fails GNG -- lomrjyo  talk 01:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. --  lomrjyo  talk 01:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, passes WP:GNG per the sources now added to the article. SailingInABathTub 🛁 14:32, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. This isn't my area of expertise, but it does seem that there are plenty of sources on the topic: in addition to the ones now in the article, there's this article, this article, a chapter on "Critical Area and Fault Probability Prediction" in this book, and many more in Google Scholar and elsewhere. Appears to meet the GNG, though it could certainly use some expansion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - obscure but evidence of notability. Thparkth (talk) 03:16, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.