Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Per the speedy closure of the other "Criticism of" article nominated by this person today. Mgm|(talk) 12:16, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator)
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete and userfy for creators and/or supporting editors, until all attack POV is removed, per BLP. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2009 (UTC) comment There is material that may be extraneous or could be moved elsewhere but that should be discussed before any afd consideration. MrMurph101 (talk) 02:51, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * comment attack pov? There's barely a sentence in the entire article which isn't sourced. -mattbuck (Talk) 02:17, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Another bad faith, pointy nomination by that editor. The article was created as a spinoff from the main article simply due to the amount of material. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots 02:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep - this has been AFD'd no fewer than three other times, and every time it's been kept. Sorry to toss out the faith, but given the nominator's history I question the motivations behind it.  Nominator provides no new rationale or other justification that hasn't been covered ad infinitum already.  Links:
 * Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly
 * Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (2nd nomination)
 * Articles for deletion/Criticism of Bill O'Reilly (political commentator) (2nd nomination)
 * //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 02:56, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:40, 17 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.