Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Math Education in the Untited States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:17, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Criticism of Math Education in the Untited States


Well, if the author of this article is American, it looks like we have sufficient grounds for an article titled "Criticism of Spelling Education in the United States". All humour aside, I'm serious about getting POV forks off Wikipedia. This is a fairly simple one; orphaned, POV, and reads like an essay. Recommendation to delete. theProject 08:12, 26 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. utcursch | talk 08:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article had potential, but the author hasn't touched (or anything else on WP) it for two months. Unless someone wants to dedicate the time to expand/complete/rework it, then it needs to go. Caknuck 08:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost all education on all subjects is criticised by someone somewhere. orphaned POV fork - Peripitus (Talk) 10:52, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Seem abandoned, almost in mid-thought. B.Wind 10:53, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete This reads as a short and unfinished POV essay.--Anthony.bradbury 17:15, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If this was Essaypedia, then maybe, but read nomination.  T   h    e    R    S    J  22:49, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Caknuck. --- RockMFR 00:31, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per above, but maybe some sourced info can be put in mathematics education? --Howrealisreal 16:40, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Tulkolahten 17:36, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Dakota 06:02, 28 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.