Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of Roadrunner Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Ordinarily I would not close an AfD with so little input, but the primary author is also the nominator, and there are reasonable arguments for the application of G7 and G10. Vanamonde (Talk) 17:37, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Criticism of Roadrunner Records
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Back in June 2022, I made this page beacause I noticed a lot of negativity/controversy around Roadrunner Records with its artists. I could have put it on the Roadrunner Records page, but chose not to because it would have taken up a significant amount of space on the page. In retrospect the page is a bad idea; I feel that it gives undue weight to the criticisms, could be interpreted as defamatory (which was not intentional) and that these criticisms should have been better intergrated into the main page in a MUCH different way. So I want to delete the page because of undue weight and other related issues with a page like this. Chchcheckit (talk) 15:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, Companies, Netherlands,  and New York.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:01, 21 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete as attack page. Carrite (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.