Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of arabism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SOAP is the first strong argument against this article. The second one is a previous AfD on the topic. And this is enough already. Tone 13:44, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Criticism of arabism

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Appears to be a list of reasons to dislike arabs, in extended essay format. To me, an unsalvagable collection of opinions. Tagishsimon (talk) 00:33, 8 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete and salt per CSD G10 and CSD G4. This article is just like so many others deleted before it, created by banned sockpuppet accounts. See Articles for deletion/Criticism of panarabism and Articles for deletion/Anti Jewish Arabism; those articles contained essentially identical WP:SOAP content to this one. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:20, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and merge with Pan-Arabism Seems to be some content worthy of including. ChildofMidnight (talk) 07:02, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Really? Where? If you can find anything salvageable beyond a sentence or two, feel free to merge what you want. However, this article is essentially the same as the others deleted before it, and the content of those was judged unsalvageable too. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:36, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * There seem to be a lot of citations and they seemed at a glance to be about this subject. No?ChildofMidnight (talk) 04:43, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * No. Please read the other deletion discussions (linked in my first comment above) for essentially the same article that has been deleted multiple times already. Cherry-picking citations to support a biased point of view is not acceptable. Furthermore, this article constitutes a POV Fork. As I said, if you can salvage anything, feel free, but past reviewers in past discussions for this article have not found anything worthwhile to keep. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If there is some substantial coverage for this perspective then it would be good to include in the parent article. A merge is one outcome to resolve a POV fork. Are notable criticisms of pan-arabism included in that article? ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:11, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * One more time: (a) If you can salvage anything useful from the POV-pushing this article represents, feel free; and (b) read previous deletion discussions. This article was deleted multiple times already on solid grounds, and therefore qualifies for speedy deletion under CSD G4 policy. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, soapbox. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. JuJube (talk) 19:03, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep very known subject with its criticism, everywhere!!! no reason why wikipedia should be exempt from this data! PS (I suggest if someone has an "issue" with it, he or she should post a substance reason for it. I came across this subject on many sources online/offline. Fadresei (talk) 23:09, 8 January 2009 (UTC) — Fadresei (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete--Per WP:SOAP and WP:COAT. --J.Mundo (talk) 07:52, 11 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.