Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Criticism of marketing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. -Doc ask?  20:08, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Criticism of marketing
This article has been here nearly two years as a stub opinion piece with no references. As it is, it is WP:OR that serves no useful purpose. Any legitimate purpose it does have could be met with a few sentences in the marketing article. --23:20, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Blainster
 * Delete its original research as demonstrated by the completely lack of sources. Gw e rnol 23:38, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, sort of OR, but mostly a dicdef, really.  --Deville (Talk) 02:44, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Just zis Guy you know? 07:04, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge at the Marketing section in the Marketing article in chief. FWIW, the article does have references of a sort, in the form of wikilinks to books and authors who criticise marketing.  Lack of references is for cleanup, not deletion.  Smerdis of Tlön 15:38, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.