Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Critique Report - Wikipedia and the AK-47


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 03:04Z 

Critique Report - Wikipedia and the AK-47

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Wikipedia is not for original research on Wikipedia. I'd have userfied this content had the author given any indication that they have registered the problem; there's been no reaction to my talk page message and the PROD tag has, of course, been removed. Also delete the images, which are falsely tagged as "public domain", but are GFDL derivative works (and also OR). Sandstein 21:55, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, this is all contra WP:OR, and WP:V. L0b0t 21:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Incredibly obvious delete Complete OR, and WP is not a how-to guide. -- Kicking222 22:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * delete speediable? Pete.Hurd 22:05, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Trust me, if WP:CSD covered this, it'd gone by now. Sandstein 22:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. I came across this before- why would someone create this? Blatant violation of various aspects of WP:NOT and WP:OR. Not speedyable for any reason I know. J Milburn 22:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Maybe the author has some sort of assignment in technical writing to do. Unfortunately, WP:NOT a free web host. Sandstein 22:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOR. --Hyperbole 22:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as OR. I thought it might have merit in project space as a guide, but it is too subjective. Guy (Help!) 22:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, an obvious school project. Kafziel Talk 23:37, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete from mainspace for obvious reasons, but keep it somewhere, this is too funny to let vanish, and too big for WP:BJ. Resolute 00:15, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete not an article. JuJube 02:20, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * move elsewhere the content is worth preserving, probably by userifying. DGG 08:18, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * !jaw drops! Pete.Hurd 06:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.