Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Estonia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:22, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Croatia–Estonia relations
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Tagged for cleanup on the basis of notability for many months, then PRODed, but then contested. Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 12:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions.  -- --Darkwind (talk) 12:43, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - A non-notable CountryX-CountryY article, many of which have been deleted in the past. Embassies, visa agreements, and state visits are routine affairs of state, not article-worthy. Tarc (talk) 13:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment If Croatia's candidacy for the European Union turned into a membership, this would probably qualify without question; however, that hasn't happened. There is some (not much) indication of a developing relationship between the two nations  .  However, unless someone wants to tackle the development of the article, I'd say that this is info that belongs in the FRO articles. Mandsford (talk) 15:12, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, even when that happens, that will still mean just one more multilateral agreement signed by both countries, albeit a significant one. It would still not mean much for the encyclopedic value of the topic. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If the two countries don't even have mutual embassies and there's no obvious reason other than lack of interest, there's little value in documenting their uninteresting relationship. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 21:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - Finland–Malta relations was deleted. As both have been full members of the European Union since 1995 and 2004 respectively, that doesn't grant notability. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  22:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - In my book, it's hard to justify keeping County X-Country Y relation articles when neither country has an embassy in the other country (Estonia's is in Budapest and Croatia's is in Helsinki). DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  22:35, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I failed to notice the lack of embassies. Joy and Ditzy has a good point on both counts. Mandsford (talk) 13:14, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete besides the Presidents meeting twice in the last 4 years, not much else to go on. (you would have to consider that leaders of European countries meet each other very regularly). LibStar (talk) 03:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.