Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Luxembourg relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 02:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

Croatia–Luxembourg relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non resident ambassadors. coverage of Croatia-Luxembourg is limited to Croatia-EU context. LibStar (talk) 01:43, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for lack of independent, significant coverage detailing this relationship. As LibStar hints, the EU holds a lot of meetings in Luxembourg, but this doesn't have to do with Luxembourg-Croatia relations as such. - Biruitorul Talk 03:24, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete for all the usual reasons. JJL (talk) 13:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Another robostub directory listing about a nonnotable subject. Edison (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Without shared embassies, there's no good reason to have a separate article about any potential relations (which have yet to be mentioned). Any information should be covered in an existing article like Foreign relations of Luxembourg or Foreign relations of Croatia when found. - Mgm|(talk) 09:59, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Absurd. Ed Fitzgerald t / c 11:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
 * NEW EVENTS HAVE MADE THESE AFDs IRRELEVANT We could really use some help with Foreign relations of Argentina by country, the first of many comprimise merges. Eventually these articles will be merged into the "diplomacy of..." articles. Lets all work together to merge these articles instead of arguing about them. So much energy has been wasted in these arguments, which could be used on merging these stub articles onto one page. I strongly encourage the nominator to withdraw the AFD nomination. Thanks. Ikip (talk) 16:35, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions.  —GregorB (talk) 12:00, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Luxembourg-related deletion discussions.  —GregorB (talk) 12:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since this relationship is ignored by reliable sources and the protoganists themselves (no embassies in respective capitals, even).Bali ultimate (talk) 20:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Is there even a relationship here? There does seem to be a precedent emerging for the Luxembourg articles- I've seen a few deleted over recent days and i see no reason why an exception should be made for this one. Minimal google news hits and all of those were coincidence of words, nothing that even begins to tackle the relationship. HJMitchell    You rang?  00:55, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.