Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croatia–Mongolia relations (4th nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  05:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Croatia–Mongolia relations
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Ten years ago, I tried to explain that there is no actual relations here or any potential. The diff since 2011 shows there's been no substantial change indeed. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 22:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 23:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mongolia-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 23:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Croatia-related deletion discussions. –<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b> ( d  c̄ ) 23:20, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete last AfD is full of keep WP:ITSNOTABLE !votes. The relations are not subject to significant coverage failing WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 23:24, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment. While I'm ordinarily all for deleting bilateral relations pages where there's little evidence of some relations existing, there is clear evidence that the relations between the two countries. Trade is minimal, but the coverage in the sources in the article already indicate that there has been some coverage pertaining to the relation between the two in the context of Croatia's bid for the UNSC and I'm also seeing an English-language paper regarding the impression of Mongolia in Croatia. I'd be curious to see if anyone has checked Mongolian-language sources or (Serbo-)Croatian language sources to see if there is more information on the high level visits that have taken place over the past twenty years that would include WP:SIGCOV of this bilateral relation. — Mhawk10 (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, of course, this is just as ridiculously fringe in Croatian as it is in English. There is no significant coverage of the topic, it's just an exercise in meaninglessness. If you just google "hrvatsko-mongolski odnosi" or "mongolsko-hrvatski odnosi", there are literally zero Croatian sources about it. This topic practically does not exist in Croatian. It's just beyond the pale. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 19:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

<p class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  00:34, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. The question is not whether relations exist or are "significant" by some definition, but rather whether significant coverage of the relationship exists. And it does not. Yilloslime (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article and the sources offered seem to support no notable relations. Yes diplomatic relations have been established, but no embassies exist. There were some diplomatic visits to virtually zero practical outcomes. I cannot imagine what the article would be about.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:56, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the comments here that there isn't any substantial information to make it worth keeping. FiddleheadLady (talk) 15:29, 7 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.