Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croc's World (video game)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

Croc's World (video game)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable – no significant coverage (e.g., critical reviews or appearances in the media) seems to exist in any independent reliable source, neither from when the game was released (2014) nor anytime after. As of this nomination, the article is completely unsourced, and was recreated in mainspace after recently being moved to draftspace (Draft:Croc's World). ComplexRational (talk) 01:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. ComplexRational (talk) 01:02, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. It's in terrible condition. Whoever want to work on it should do it on the existing draft. Neocorelight (Talk) 14:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Apparently there's a whole series of these titles that have at least gotten one review from TouchArcade, and that helps its case, but not enough. Other entries in that search are just listings of release dates without any non-trivial coverage, and Metacritic pages all give me a big fat goose egg in terms of amount of reviews. As of now, this has a better chance of not getting eaten by a croc in a Florida river (believe me, I have aunts and uncles living in Florida, I know). User:HumanxAnthro ( Nina Cortex x Coco Bandicoot ) 03:53, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I almost mistook it as the part of the Croc series, but it seems to be just another Super Mario Bros. mobile rip-off. It doesn't seem to be notable now, nor that it will be in near future. The article is presently in a horrible state, either way. -Vipz (talk) 04:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Very poor for mainspace, and does not follow NPOV or verfiability. All of the article is OR. Consider this line: It seems like entirely OR and like an ad for the game. No significamt coverage exists for this, so delete is a easy vote. VickKiang (talk) 07:53, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per all preceding rationale. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 16:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Deleting it does not add anything as (though limited) info can still be obtained from it. No real reason to delte. RJS001 (talk) 03:27, 4 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.