Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croce Taravella


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Insufficient input despite being here for 3 weeks, although I would note that User:Cavarrone's argument for keeping is stronger than the argument for deletion put forward by the nominator. Michig (talk) 08:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Croce Taravella

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent significant coverage, found only passing mentions, catalog records and a few exhibition announcements. Article doesn't establish notability either. GermanJoe (talk) 14:22, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 00:21, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep, the Italian version of the article include a lot of RS, examples of significant coverage include, , , , , , . Especially ANSA, La Repubblica and L'Unità are highly reputable mainstream sources. He has an entry in Atlante: geografia e storia della giovane arte italiana, an dictionary about contemporary art, plus other minor book sources. Also, participating at the Venice Biennale is almost ever a strong sign of notability for a contemporary artist. Cavarrone 01:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  Talk   15:40, 8 July 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.