Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Croeserw Football Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 00:57, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Croeserw Football Club

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable football club in a non notable football league. 16 distinct Google hits for the football league, only 5 for Croeserw football club. Club has only 35 players, no notable history (established in 1992, never played in a higher league), stadium with a capacity of 250, ... Fails WP:NOTE. Fram 19:34, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete they only play in their local district, have never won anything, and even their ground improvements cost less than a small house (oh god, I'm starting on about house prices - shoot me someone!) Totnesmartin 20:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment This has a rather confusing history. It seems as though someone has hijacked a stub article about an industrial estate, Croeserw, moved and renamed the article then created what we now see as an article about the football club. --Malcolmxl5 21:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Still not notable though. --Malcolmxl5 21:27, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable enough. Harlowraman 22:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 07:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Number   5  7  08:07, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentAs mentioned above, the original article was not about a football club at all, the original article was re-directed to this. Is it an option to re-instate that article or not? ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 15:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, the original (v. v. v. stubby) version is still in the edit history. Just leave out the part about bloke being abducted by aliens and becoming an emo, which doesn't seem to have references. Totnesmartin 15:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but this version didn't include the emo loving alien..... :) However, my vote would be to revert to the original version using the article name of Croeserw - if that counts as a vote of course!  ♦Tangerines♦ · Talk 00:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Not notable. *drew 15:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.