Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cromagnon (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Cromagnon (band)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable subject fails WP:MUSIC criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia. The Real Libs-speak politely 08:23, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

keep- passes 5.Rockgenre (talk)Rockgenre 20:15, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * keep - This band clearly satisfies #5, "Has released two or more albums on a major label or one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years and a roster of performers, many of which are notable).", as both of their albums listed have been released by ESP-disk. Luminifer (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Question-Since you are knowledgeable on the subject why weren't these albums detailed in the article when it was created? The Real Libs-speak politely 14:02, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not knowledgeable about the subject; I just looked at the article, saw the references at the bottom, and clicked on them. All the details are at allmusic. In fact, if you look at the creator's talk page, you can see me thanking them for creating this article about which I previously knew nothing. Luminifer (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * comment I've notified the creator for you. Also, I'm listing this in music discussions. Luminifer (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Luminifer
 * Keep - per WP:BAND criterion 5 - has released two more albums on an important indie label. I still think that policy is too inclusive but that doesn't change the fact it's current policy. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:35, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I have no idea who this band is, but I went to the article looking for info because one of their songs is #163 on Pitchfork's best of the 60s list.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamaliel (talk • contribs)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.