Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cronian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure)  →TSU tp* 07:15, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Cronian

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Prodded and deprodded. The only reference is a stub review in AllMusic. WP:BAND requires at least two non-trivial articles in reliable sources. meco (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. meco (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. meco (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. meco (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:MUSIC bullet 6, as being composed of two highly notable musicians. As for the Allmusic review, this one is by no means a stub, and the Internet is littered with reviews of their albums. Chubbles (talk) 23:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - Per Chubbles. NickCT (talk) 14:55, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:48, 1 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets WP:MUSIC#6 at minimum. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:50, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.