Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crooked edge

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 15:24, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)

Crooked edge
Seems to be a non-notable movement. A google test on
 * "Crooked Edge" Jonathan Culver

turned up nothing. I am voting delete. Sjakkalle 09:06, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * No google hits. I would expect a notable movement in this era to have at least some web presence. Delete. Mgm|(talk) 10:58, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete there's no shortage of punk/straight-edge info on the web, so you'd expect that a notable sub-movement could manage at least one hit. Delete. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  12:45, Mar 17, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Either vanity or madeupTjc 15:20, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible hoax. Megan1967 23:55, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.