Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crookhurst Farm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Crookhurst Farm

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article is basically nothing more than a scary ghost story with almost no encyclopedic value. A quick search revealed the existence of something known as Crookhurst Farm, but there's nothing that indicates that the rest of the article isn't a very obvious WP:HOAX. Pishcal — ♣ 20:29, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, and possible hoax. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Searches turn up nothing more than an old farmhouse now available as holiday cottages. Article is woefully under-referenced, thus unverifiable. Verifiability is a cornerstone of Wikipedia! — Hebrides (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I grew up in the area and heard nothing about this supposedly haunted farm. However, I'm willing to change my opinion if sources can be provided. Perhaps we've been too quick to jump the gun and it would be beneficial to give the original author time to find appropriate sources? Pitipaci (talk) 13:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.