Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cropsyst


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus, so keep and redirect, respectively. Johnleemk | Talk 17:06, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

CropSyst, Cropsyst
Obscure, not notable, orphan, possible vanity Mecanismo 23:07, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, two spelling variations about the same thing, I put the afd tag on the other one too and linked here. CropSyst is the more comprehensive article. - Bobet 00:12, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, yes - I realise I must have set up the Cropsyst article incorrectly. The article with the capital S is the correct one - Cropsyst can be removed and CropSyst should remain. &mdash;the preceding unsigned comment is by 143.234.88.102 (talk &bull; contribs) 10:47, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete, appears to be little more than original research. Stifle 10:06, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, I don't understand the last 'Weak Delete' comment - could you clarify?
 * Weak keep looks like encyclopedic material to me. Article would be greatly improved by demonstrating impact of CropSyst to address Mecanismo's concerns.  If it is used in peer reviewed articles, then documentation of that would demonstrate that it is not WP:OR, and address Stifle's concerns. Pete.Hurd 18:35, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment, Yes, CropSyst is certainly used within many peer reviewed papers - a list of the papers is found on this page - http://www.sipeaa.it/ASP/ASP2/CropSyst.asp
 * Keep CropSyst, since it's in somewhat wide use in its field. And change Cropsyst to redirect. - Bobet 12:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless copyvio problems can be resolved, since the article is identical to the information here: . Peyna 13:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.