Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crosman Air Mag C11


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete all. Courcelles 07:01, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Crosman Air Mag C11

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Delete: Article on non-notable random airsoft guns. Fails to meet WP:N by a long shot. TheFSAviator &bull; T 21:24, 17 December 2010 (UTC) I am also nominating these page for deletion for the same reason as above:


 * Delete for lack of obvious notability. The sourcing is flawed as well, one article is sourced to myspace, for example. There might be salvageable information, and that could possibly be merged over to Crosman, perhaps? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:17, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Also: "long shot"... I see what you did there. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:06, 23 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment. CA 249 listed above is not an airsoft gun but a redirect. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - CA 249 may be a redirect, but the article proposed above is CA249, which isn't. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:47, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Fix'd. No space was in the title.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:16, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:04, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete all - Community consensus is that airsoft guns are rarely notable, and none of these articles provide either a claim of notability or significant coverage in reliable independent sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 00:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 06:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.