Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossCharge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

CrossCharge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * (ConnectMyEV: )
 * (ConnectMyEV: )

Obvious G11 created by clear COI account, declined by on the basis that it would require AfD. So again, here we are.

Sources presented in the article fail WP:CORPDEPTH badly, and a WP:BEFORE search turned up absolutely zip. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:29, 7 June 2020 (UTC)
 * neither corpdeath nor Before is relevant to G11. For asubject like this, I want others to hve a look also.  DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I guess I just don't see what puts an obvious piece of corporate spam in need of a full AfD when G11 exists for just such things. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 07:35, 8 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment: The former Green Dot Charging company now appears to be trading as ConnectMyEV, and their conductive charging system appears to be similarly named as ConnectMyEV rather than CrossCharge., so I have added another Find-Sources above. AllyD (talk) 06:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article by describing a start-up company's proposition, with the text featuring superlatives about their product being the first and safest such product, maximising convenience, etc., without reliable 3rd party sources. Aside from routine listings, searches find a 2015 brief Q&A with the company founder  and  a February 2018 announcement about the venture arm of Stanley Black & Decker taking a minority stake in the company  but I am not finding the  independent coverage which would be needed (WP:PRODUCT / WP:NCORP) to sustain an article here, even if pruned of promotional wording. AllyD (talk) 07:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.