Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CrossCountry network


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to CrossCountry. Liz Read! Talk! 22:55, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

CrossCountry network

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is effectively a template page, but in article space. If it is not already covered, the table to the left should go to CrossCountry. The template should already have its own page in the Template namespace. None of the information on the left is even sourced! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Transportation, England, Scotland,  and Wales. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to CrossCountry, agree there is no significant information in the article, but it probably is appropriate to keep it as a redirect.  Dank Jae  15:16, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge any useful info to CrossCountry per WP:NLIST.  APK  whisper in my ear  06:03, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to a new sub-section of CrossCountry. Iif the table was appropriately sourced, I may have suggested merging as the content could be useful, yet it could be inaccurate and so adding it as new data to the target could be misleading. As the route map is already a template, I can't see any benefit to merging. Bungle (talk • contribs) 07:42, 15 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.