Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross (2011 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 06:17, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

Cross (2011 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I'm struggling to find indepth critical reviews for this film, as the only other piece of significant coverage I could find was this review, which I'm unsure would count as reliable CiphriusKane (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Film. CiphriusKane (talk) 03:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Review cited in article is CineMagazine which is reliable per many AfD discussions. Also found one at IGN (which is also a Rotten Tomatoes listed critic) . DVD Talk is also a reliable source  Donald D23   talk to me  04:15, 12 October 2022 (UTC)


 * soft Keep Review cited in article is Reliable source Distributed by	Sony Pictures. Hitfit9999 (talk) 07:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep (or Neutral as second preference). While this fails WP:NFILM in that I doubt that the critics are nationally well-known, it might weakly pass WP:GNG. The sources are far from the best, but IGN and DVD Talk are RS, as well as perhaps CineMagazine per, despite that it neither had a discussion on RSN nor was listed on WikiProject Film/Resources. There is also a review from PopMatters, 1, I can't entirely agree that the website is reliable, but it is listed so per WP:A/S, so it might be presumed that it could be generally reliable for films as well. Therefore, the latter two refs (PopMatter and CineMagazine) have iffy reliability IMHO; however, I'm still going to go with weak keep.  VickKiang  (talk)  22:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as per reviews in IGN, Pop Matters, DVD Talk, passes WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.