Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cross of the UnderTaker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Dakota 01:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Cross of the UnderTaker
Totally not worthy of its own article: an article on the Undertaker is appropriate, but one on his cross is not, especially since the cross has little significance even inside the world of pro wrestling. (|--  UlT i MuS  07:00, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. A stage prop? --Daniel Olsen 07:16, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - it's a stage prop. Enough said. MER-C 07:54, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not just a stage prop, but a symbol/logo. Either way, not notable in its own right. Caknuck 08:53, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - symbol of wrestling character, utterly undeserving of its own article. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Pointless fancruft. -- I sl a y So lo mo n  |  t a l k  09:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Not even remotely notable. Pursey 10:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mark Calaway. Don't see how it could hurt, it's only an extre sentence or two. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mark Calaway. Information which can be kept but not worthy of its own article. Matthuxtable 13:17, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

wickanprince- Ok I see your piont so possible fusion with the Undertaker Page itself?


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.