Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossfire (magazine)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 13:35, 13 November 2010 (UTC)

Crossfire (magazine)

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This is a student publication at a university, but no independent reliable sources have been provided to establish notability. I recommend that the page be deleted. Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Subject fails the general notability guideline. --AussieLegend (talk) 19:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  --  Bduke    (Discussion)  06:08, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as above and per general precedent against articles for student activity at a single school. Even the article implies it was never notable and admits it's in decline now due to lack of interest. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:39, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.