Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossfire KM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Crossfire KM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A promotional article likely created by a COI editor. I am not able to find any coverage in independent sources that would establish notability (besides this human-interest story in a local paper). I initially tagged this as a G11, but an earlier G11 tag was removed by. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 23:35, 13 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Speedy G11 - Before removing the speedy tag, had been dormant for over a year. The main article they edited before that was Bridgewater-Raritan High School which is described in the source you've linked above as the founders' high school. This editor is obviously connected. The source also mentions "Julian Melendi," a name that seems to match, the page creator. This article is promotional. Toss it. —  {Cryptic  Canadian}  00:52, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey all! Original author here! My bad on misunderstanding the rules, my first article! Upon reviewing the rules, totally agree this should be deleted. My bad! Go ahead and remove. Thanks! Julianmelendi (talk) 00:56, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - I was the first nominator for g11. Aside from the obvious conflict of interest (and clumsy meatpuppetry), there's no indication of notability per WP:ORG or WP:GNG, and I can find no significant coverage of the group online in reliable, secondary sources. Captain Calm (talk)
 * Delete - highly promotional article relying almost exclusively on self-published sources. --Slashme (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, Promotional article, not enough independent sources, Alex-h (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete – Promotional piece on a subject that clearly lacks significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. Citobun (talk) 08:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.