Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crossmorphic sensor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 20:17, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Crossmorphic sensor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure if this is a real technology. No hits on google scholar, and the only reference is to the website www.crossmorphictech2015.org. --Sammy1339 (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC) Sammy1339 (talk) 20:08, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails GNG - appears very recent; thus article written by inventor Darla Xavier (user Real d xavier), . Hopefully it will be a big success, but too soon for WP article. —Мандичка YO 😜 21:51, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 07:54, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – It's apparently too soon for this to have gotten any third-party coverage. Maybe later after more papers and articles about it have appeared. – Margin1522 (talk) 14:50, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Did somebody realize that the author of the article added the following hidden comment : "This is a fictional technology created as part of an Alternate Reality Game"? So, it's most probably a hoax. Anyway, I couldn't find any evidence that this (alleged) technology would be notable. --Edcolins (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.