Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crow, Texas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy/snowball keep. The notability of geographic places is well established.--chaser - t 16:37, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Crow, Texas

 * - (|View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N. --Skater (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep The major map services show it as a placemark, and unincorporation is not a guidline to deletion of a community article.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 11:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources might be misplaced, but the external links are valid sources and clearly show this is a real inhabited place, which are commonly considered notable as long as they're verifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 11:35, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  13:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Mgm. — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  13:41, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per above.--Cube lurker (talk) 14:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep as a real geographical location. - Dravecky (talk) 14:27, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Per precedent, even an unincorporated community does not fail WP:N. Mandsford (talk) 15:50, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.