Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowe brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Sedd&sigma;n talk 00:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Crowe brothers

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

With articles existing on all members of the family, and nothing outside this article that implies that the significance of them being related is anything more than the fact that they are related and both played cricket. I would suggest delete, with no scope for a redirect. SGGH ping! 17:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete As a fan of the Crowe brothers, I say delete, brothers playing in the same national team at the same time isn't unique to them, so it isn't notable. We don't have the Waugh twins, Pathan brothers etc etc. Redirect wouldn't be helpful either, no one searches for Crowe brothers and so on. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 19:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.  —David Eppstein (talk) 23:54, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - SimonLyall (talk) 10:31, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I see no notability/reson for this article. --Triwbe (talk) 11:27, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree that its unnecessary and such an unlikely search term that it doesn't need to be a redirect.dramatic (talk) 01:01, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete we already have articles for these two. Stuartyeates (talk) 01:24, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.