Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crowfoots Carriers Ltd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete &mdash; Caknuck (talk) 06:38, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

Crowfoots Carriers Ltd

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Was a speedy deletion, but this is a company with 95+ years of history so it seems plausible that it's notable, it seems to be mentioned in at least one history book. Gets a few results on Google News archive and Google books but nothing substantial as far as I can tell. Needs better sourcing. Otherwise, Delete --W.marsh 16:26, 26 November 2007 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild 13:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete. The mentions in third-party sources are clearly trivial. There are thousands of companies with limited liability like this and the vast majority are non-notable. As an interesting note, when I was working this summer I had to deal with a load of things coming in and out from various companies and I sure didn't think about creating Wikipedia articles for any of them... well, I did think about creating articles for them, but didn't actually do it because I knew they would not survive any AfD.--h i s  s p a c e   r e s e a r c h 12:05, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nom & Research. Twenty Years 15:01, 4 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.