Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Crown University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:10, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Crown University

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non accredited university. No sources, repeatedly recreated advertising for a dodgy university. noq (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is in such poor condition that it is hard to understand what it is talking about: Crown University never acquainted the charge of any accreditation from any organization. It is a cocky accurate body. It maintains all the all-embracing educational affection parameters. ... Crown University apprehend that apprenticeship is a appropriate for all citizens, behindhand of ethnicity, amusing cachet or wealth. It is a accepted actuality that the amount of tertiary apprenticeship continues to acceleration anniversary year. Looking at a prior deleted version of the article, it appears that the author may have started with a prior article about this university, and then substituted words selected from a thesaurus (or from a machine translation and then retranslation back into English) in place of most of the nouns and adjectives -- resulting in an incomprehensible text. In any event, the only sources cited in this article appear to be pages from the university's own web site which is not even accessible at this time. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 21:43, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 19 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. From the locations mentioned, the article appears to be about this online university. • Gene93k (talk) 23:58, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That website was apparently written by someone with a similar level of writing skill: Applicant should submit his resume includes all his practical and educational experiences clear and obvious, though our administration team could evaluate it accurately and take a decision of acceptance. However, the student should provide the Academy with all documents and certificates proofs his experiences stated in his C.V. or application for admission. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:02, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Almost qualifies for speedy deletion as a page with an indiscernible topic, but the URLs and some of the text do give some relevant clues. For the record, I can't access the website cited in the article (site's bandwidth limit exceeded). The institution is clearly a scam, but that conclusion is based only on my own original research; I can't find third-party sourced information about it. I think that scam universities should be documented in Wikipedia to the extent possible (including listing them in List of unaccredited institutions of higher education), but this one can't be documented (not even in that list) because there's no sourced information. --Orlady (talk) 03:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Almost certainly  a diploma mill. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:54, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per Clandestine universities are not exempt from the notability policy. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  senator  ─╢ 21:33, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.